PACS systems for hospitals, can you tell us which manufacturers in the industry do a good job? Cost-effective would be better.

Want to change a set of domestic cis system, there are quite a few domestic cost-effective a little more And there are a lot of well-known brands are quite good um Chevrolet and so on, they have.

If the hospital is large, the product requirements for PACS will be higher, we work more with Bo for software, their PACS do count very good, their PACS system is very full-featured, our size of the hospital customers, there are complete solutions, workstations can also seamlessly integrate their self-developed three-dimensional reconstruction module to achieve the extreme speed of the three-dimensional post-processing, they hospital case very much, the three-dimensional reconstruction module is very good, the three-dimensional post-processing, the three-dimensional post-processing, the three-dimensional post-processing, the three-dimensional post-processing, the three-dimensional post-processing. Their hospital cases are very many, three hospitals are also many, detailed you can do more to understand. I hope to give you some ideas. In order to save money for the hospital starting point is good. But the PACS system is still relatively high technical requirements, in addition to more equipment involved, if you invest so much time and energy to get a set of hospitals to meet the use of their own, in addition to the cycle of long estimated that the development of information technology hospitals can not wait so long ah. If so there is some more to lose than to gain. If you want to market can consider team development. Even if the development of your hospital will not buy, other hospitals will not buy. If you stay in the information technology department for a long time to understand this truth: procurement outside the mature there are people to maintain. Any product should be the first demand and the market as the first consideration, the bottom does not do, the business relationship with no hospital and so complex ... you do what? There are these five years to do something bad. From the technical point of view, you used to engage in JAVA, engage in management systems and databases okay, and PACS underlying basic core are c++, your experience of DICOM themselves did not mention but according to the question is not very professional. Management system and medical image itself is two ideas. The development of medical information has gone through from application to integration, from business to data, from in-hospital care to out-of-hospital health, from pc to internet+. Looking up is the industry trend, and drilling down is how new technologies are being integrated into healthcare. There are many, many more things to come, mining clinical big data, telemedicine services, AI + healthcare applications,

Copyright ? 2018 by the author. For commercial reprints, please contact the author for authorization, and for non-commercial reprints, please cite the source.