According to the website of the Ministry of Education, the Regulations on School Food Safety and Nutrition Health Management formulated by the Ministry of Education, the State Administration of Market Supervision, the National Health and Wellness Committee and other departments was recently announced, and it will take effect on April 1 day 2065438. The "Regulations" clarify that primary and secondary schools and kindergartens are generally not allowed to set up food business places such as canteens and supermarkets on campus. If it is really necessary to set it up, it shall obtain permission according to law to avoid selling foods with high salt, sugar and fat.
This move is really good, and there is a system of accompanying meals by the person in charge, mainly for food safety reasons. School is a place where food safety is easy to happen. Once it happens, the consequences are very serious. This provision can be said to avoid this situation from the legal level.
Not only for safety, but also for students' health. At present, there are too many unhealthy foods with high salt and fat, which affect the health of students and have some potential threats that cannot be ignored. Increasing the access system of campus food sales can prevent unhealthy food from infringing on students from the source. Although the school canteens and supermarkets are convenient for teachers and students, there has been a lack of effective supervision. Such measures are good and can help teachers and students form good habits.
This is just mindless behavior! If day schools are available, students can buy what they need on their way to and from school. Boarding school, without shops, is inhuman, students can't go out, and it's inconvenient to buy daily necessities. It will definitely have an impact on children's psychology and life. In addition, it is not too much for students to eat snacks in buy buy occasionally. Can't the school have some personal activities? What's the point of that day's life? What the school wants to manage is not to close the store, but to stipulate what the store will sell! Whether boarding or day school, supermarket stationery is indispensable, food should be safe, and it is not too much to sell some educational toys. For boarding schools, it is most appropriate to eat some fruit. Children live in school for a long time, and the school diet is not good. Eat some fruit to supplement vitamins. Don't sell fruit by the catty, but by the piece. How much is an apple and an orange? . . . Neither waste nor children can afford it.
You're welcome to say that some children in canteens, supermarkets and primary schools and kindergartens focus on some spicy strips and some junk food.
Therefore, it is a very wise decision to close the school canteen and supermarket. Children really don't need much change to take to school, but they can only compare improperly.
In school teaching, we often find such cases, that is, children steal some money from home, or take some money to the supermarket to go to the canteen and buy a lot of snacks to share in the classroom. It seems that they are rich and can establish their own prestige. Actually, this is a comparison. You buy it for me today and I'll buy it for you tomorrow. We are good partners, because such an atmosphere is among the students.
If there are no small shops in the school, there is no need for too much change at all, and parents don't need to give their children too much change, which will cause children to fail to keep up with the competition. They even secretly save money to buy some dangerous toys. These are all good signs. The state should have issued this requirement a long time ago, and some parents may raise objections. What should children do if they need five things urgently? In fact, this kind of worry is unnecessary.
What urgent things do children need to do at school? Come out. Basically nothing. If something really happens, you can ask the teacher for help. If the teacher can't solve it, you can call your parents and talk it over when you can't go home. Why do you make things so urgent?
In short, the cancellation of some school canteens and supermarkets directly protected children's health, but also avoided the possibility of the school bullying incident.
This should not be a problem.
First of all, supermarkets and small shops have their own significance, because there is demand.
Secondly, children should not become learning machines. They can better understand the role of money and better form the concept of financial management through purchasing.
Once again:
There is no direct conflict between the existence of small shops and supermarkets and education itself. You can't let your parents babysit and prepare everything for them. They can't take care of themselves at all.
Fourth, regarding the business scope of small shops and supermarkets, as schools can contract some business categories.
Good thing.
First, the corruption of school leaders has been eliminated, and the income of small treasury has become less.
Second, students eat less food, which is good for their health.
Third, parents are more at ease and don't have to worry about their children spending money on school or competing with each other to buy more things.
Schools and teachers are hot topics at present. The reasons for this phenomenon are different, and there are many analyses. However, in my opinion, few rational people, many people are venting their anger! Give two examples of current hot topics:
First, make up lessons
Parents did all this, watching the excitement, shouting and killing, and spared no effort, but few people seriously explored the reasons and put forward rational suggestions. Now schools and teachers basically don't make up lessons, but has the burden on parents increased or decreased? Has the burden on children increased or decreased?
Second, the problem of the school supermarket.
The purpose of setting up a supermarket in the school is to prevent children from eating "three noes" food outside school and causing mass incidents. However, the school can't participate in the operation all the time, so it adopts the way that the superior (above the municipal level) designates several qualified merchants to participate in the bidding to set up the school. In fact, this practice is also the requirement of most parents. The school is not the beneficiary, but it attracts the sound of killing. Well, now that the school supermarket has been banned, do children stop eating snacks? Or snacks are more secure?
Therefore, the author believes that running education well is really related to the public interest, but rational suggestions will help to improve it. Holding a cynical attitude is also unsatisfactory, and it is also full of support. I never think rationally, and I'm afraid it won't help if I follow the trend and shout to kill. On the contrary, it will make decision makers at a loss, and it is better to do more than one thing. It must be the poor children who suffer in the end!
I am a lotus seed. Let's talk about my opinion.
The "Regulations on School Food Safety and Nutrition Health Management" formulated by the Ministry of Education, the State Administration of Market Supervision, the National Health and Wellness Committee and other departments was recently promulgated and came into force on April 1 day, 2065438. The "Regulations" clarify that primary and secondary schools and kindergartens are generally not allowed to set up food business places such as canteens and supermarkets on campus. If it is really necessary to set it up, it shall obtain permission according to law to avoid selling foods with high salt, sugar and fat. As can be seen from this regulation, the school canteen was forced to stop by the state.
For the country to stop the primary and secondary school canteens, Lotus seeds support them with both hands. Setting up canteens in schools has the following disadvantages:
First, it is not conducive to school management.
Primary and secondary schools are places to educate students, and canteens are places to sell goods for consumers. The operators of school canteens are mostly outsourced. The school has no say in the purchase channels, food safety and sales price of the canteen. The canteen operator is an independent legal person. In a way, the two are equal.
Second, it is not conducive to students' education.
Eating snacks is a common problem for students. After the school opened the canteen, students all had a mentality of keeping up with the joneses. Seeing other students buying snacks, students who don't buy snacks are influenced by their classmates and worry that they will laugh at having no money. After a long time, I got into the habit of spending money indiscriminately.
Third, it is not conducive to the health of students.
Many snacks sold in the canteen are junk food, which is not good for students. Especially in summer, some students with poor physique or bad stomach can easily cause gastrointestinal diseases.
Fourth, it affects the campus environmental sanitation.
The canteen is located on campus, and students go to buy snacks, drinks and so on. It is easy to throw away garbage such as food packaging bags and empty beverage bottles, which affects the campus environmental sanitation.
Fifth, there are great security risks.
In the canteens on campus, the market supervision is not in place, and the school administrators are not professional, so it is impossible to identify whether the things they sell are safe. Once there is expired or deteriorated food, it will not only cause physical harm to students, but also have a great negative impact on schools and society.
To sum up, lotus seed advocates prohibiting the establishment of canteens on campus.
I support this resolution with both hands.