Women's wear is popular in Japan, and there are many historical reasons besides the inherent heavy taste of this nation. During the Edo period in Japan, many generals even Guan Bai used women's clothing as a way to reward their subordinates or as a form to reward concubines. Even some daughters of poor families will take the initiative to use this form to achieve their own goals in order to enter public houses. On the most critical issue, the words are vague, and ICBC's oath of "no such thing" seems to be lacking in confidence. It is impossible to win the trust of the public.
There is a better way, but there is no need to fight the Japanese media from a distance in the eyes of public suspicion. This obviously gives people a suspicion of being selfless and harming others. ICBC is not unaware that rumors are not eaten by women, and words alone cannot solve the problem. If you don't say what you should say and don't do what you shouldn't do, even if you say "no" loudly, what practical effect can it have? Not only can't dispel the public's doubts, but it makes us feel guilty from ICBC's poor public relations, which can't help but arouse the public's reverie: Is ICBC really a bad public relations strategy or is it a dead duck with a hard mouth? I would rather be so embarrassed by "rumors" than show my itinerary to the public. Are there any secrets more unbearable than eat woman's clothes, such as public travel?