I am a farmer and my husband is an ordinary citizen without any background or relationship. Work depends entirely on your own diligence and serious responsibility.
Some people when the principal, arrange work, depends on your background, or whether you are good at approaching him at ordinary times, can you play with him? Nepotism, regardless of your work attitude and performance.
In those years, which class was naughty? Which class is more difficult to manage? Which class has poor grades? He arranged for me to be the head teacher of that class and teach mathematics in that class. In a word, I am a professional in a bad class.
No matter how bad the class is, I can straighten it out and manage it for a while. I thought that if the management is good and the leaders can see it, it will give me better job opportunities and let me teach some slightly better classes.
However, I was wrong. People who pretend to be blind will never see reality.
Aren't you good at managing bad classes? Take care of this grade, and the next grade, you will pick up the worst! I have been forbearing, teaching any class is a job. Then I often hear people who teach well in class, Versailles in front of you: Oh, I don't want to teach well in class. There is a lot of pressure to teach well. It is better to teach ordinary classes, and there is not so much teaching pressure. I even boasted that if I taught ordinary classes, I would train several masters in the class.
Actually, everyone knows that. Teaching a good lesson is the best way to make a teacher. It has both achievements and respect, as well as fame and fortune. It's basically praise and reward. I didn't teach well, and I worked hard, not only with the students, but also with Zhou Xuan, an emotional parent. I suffered a lot and failed to achieve results. Basically, they were criticized and deducted money.
No matter how he arranges it, I will accept it. I have been in obscurity, working hard and trying to teach bad classes well. Just live up to your conscience.
It was particularly hard to be a class teacher in those years, but for 30 yuan a month, no one wanted to be a class teacher. I am assigned to be the head teacher every semester, and I go to the worst class. Later, the allowance for the class teacher rose a little. With five years of experience as a class teacher, some people wanted to be a class teacher. I won't be arranged to be a class teacher, and someone else will be a teacher for one year. If not, let me take it. Some people are willing to be a class teacher at the beginning when they see some benefits, but they find that being a class teacher is too tired and the pay is far higher than the return. Or you can't be a student, and you can't control students at all. So few people are willing to be class teachers now. It's all arranged by the leaders, forcing them to do more work.
I put up with it, too Take it. But bullying honest people is like this. If you don't talk, he will treat you as a mute.
Bullies can do anything. Every time I arrange invigilation for the exam, I am asked to invigilate the examination room. Everyone knows that the students in the final examination room have the worst grades, the most cunning and the most naughty. If you can't afford the exam, you want to doze off or cheat. The invigilator takes care of them as the most tiring thing.
There are more excesses! Many new teachers suddenly came that semester and asked me to teach a class. Although my income is very small, I am happy and relaxed. Who knows that in the second semester, there are young teachers who have to teach in order to evaluate their professional titles, and there are fewer people. They asked me to teach two classes and take over the other class. How hateful? When someone else taught a better class, he transferred another person to that class and transferred the worst class taught by the person who took that class to me.
I still silently took it. I have endured this for many years. Others either teach two good classes, or teach a good class and then teach a poor class to match. I'm the only one, and I've always been the worst two classes at the bottom, and I'm no worse than others in the end. After the first year of high school, it is divided into arts and sciences. The students in that class are the most difficult to manage, and the liberal arts class is particularly annoying. He asked me to take two worst liberal arts courses again.
I can't bear to bully an honest man again and again. When I came to his office, I just wanted to put forward my reasonable request, hoping that he would be fair when arranging his work. Who knows that the headmaster actually said: You should teach those two classes according to the teaching results.
Now, I understand. In fact, he doesn't know how each teacher's grades are. It's just that in his heart, he thinks my teaching performance is very poor. But I want to find him. I'm ready. I immediately took out my report card from my bag and threw it in front of him: if I arrange my work according to my grades, it's really not my turn. Please take a closer look at my grades. Which one is worse than the others? When did you arrange the job and didn't treat me like this?
Even if I was given the worst class, in the end, my teaching performance was not worse than other classes at the same level. So I have the confidence to argue with him.
Obviously, he was wrong. He even slapped my desk: What should a person do? Why can't I arrange you to do it?
I suddenly got angry: I have to do all kinds of work, why do I always have to do the most annoying thing? Caught me bullying people alone, right?
You clap the table for me, I clap louder than you. If you want to speak louder, hold me down. I speak louder than you. I have a point. Am I still afraid of you? You are a person of status, I am an ordinary person, and I hold the truth. What am I afraid of? You have the right to pinch my neck, but I didn't offend you before I quarreled with you. You're clamping tighter! At this time, I didn't hesitate. What am I afraid of?
He never imagined that a hard-working female teacher broke out so badly. So glib! He doesn't know, I'm not stupid, I just endure!
From then on, I can enjoy the same and slightly equal job opportunities as other ordinary people.
With his down-to-earth and serious work, he has also changed several principals. I have taught the worst class and gradually improved to a better class. Now that I have taught inspirational classes, I feel that management is much easier than those bad classes in the past. Of course! Teaching pressure is also much greater. But I am willing to calm down and study teaching and accept the challenge of teaching. Traveling far is better than fighting with naughty classmates.
Therefore, in my opinion, the teacher who is against the principal is either bullied too badly and unbearable, and finally broke out. Or too upright to rub the sand with your eyes.
Teachers are all highly educated. A fair, upright, kind-hearted, managing the school according to law, making good use of people and caring for teachers and students, teachers will certainly like him, support him and will not oppose him.
I hope the headmaster is a beam of light that illuminates and warms the teachers and students of the whole school. What teachers and students in the school feel is not gloom, but depression and suffocation.
I have worked in a township junior high school for more than 10 years and met three teachers who were against the principal.
First, find fault bluntly and attack with transfer.
There is a teacher in the school named Mr. Ma, who is in his thirties and used to be a soldier. After jumping ship, he taught by mistake.
He is honest, frank and outspoken. He often confronts the headmaster at meetings, which makes him very embarrassed.
During the Spring Festival that year, the school wanted to get some benefits from the teacher, and the principal asked one of his relatives to handle it. Most of the results were poor.
The teachers dared to speak out in anger. Teacher Ma called on everyone to take things and asked the headmaster to return them.
Everyone dared not, so Mr. Ma went to question the headmaster alone. Knowing that he was indefensible, the headmaster promised to take back the goods and send money directly.
From then on, Mr. Ma was called "Master Ma" by the teachers, and he readily agreed.
The following summer vacation, the headmaster transferred him to a township primary school on the grounds of unqualified academic qualifications and low teaching level, and arranged him in a remote primary school, which made life extremely inconvenient.
He "learned from a painful experience" and was determined to "repent". He went to the headmaster to admit his mistake and promised not to embarrass him again. A year later, he was transferred back to junior high school.
However, whoever wants to call him "Ma Daxia" again, he will stop it at once, and even call him "Dare, Dare".
After getting drunk, the headmaster patted him on the shoulder: "Your pony is like a stone in the river. It started to be angular, but I didn't grind it into pebbles? "
Second, the former classmates are all principals and they are not satisfied with each other.
Mr Xiong and Mr Zhang are both old normal students. They all teach Chinese to the graduating class of Grade Three, and they all have a set of teaching skills, but Mr. Xiong always has a slight advantage in teaching.
The two fought in secret, but on the whole they got along well.
But then things changed. Teacher Zhang has a relative who is a county leader. He was promoted to be the dean of educational affairs.
Later, I can often hear Mr. Xiong secretly comment on Mr. Zhang, saying that he is relying on personal connections, not real skills, and his words are quite wronged.
A year later, the old headmaster retired and Mr. Zhang was promoted to headmaster.
Mr. Xiong's resentment was finally unbearable. He became fond of drinking and got drunk every time he drank.
When he was drunk, the first thing he did was to make a cup of tea and sit on the desk in the office with his legs crossed. He named Mr. Zhang, saying that he was unlearned, that he was a learned little man, and that he used improper words.
President Zhang is calm and never gets angry. Instead, I praised Mr. Xiong at the teacher meeting, saying that he was really cool, and I had to thank him for pointing out his shortcomings.
But Mr. Xiong didn't appreciate it and he didn't miss it. This farce has been staged for three years.
In the fourth year, the school was designated as a pilot teacher appointment system by the county.
This year, Mr. Xiong was hired.
He made a scene in the principal's office, and President Zhang reported it to the Education Bureau. The education bureau came to warn Mr. Xiong that he should obey the organization's arrangement, otherwise he will bear the consequences.
Teacher Xiong only needs to apply for a rural primary school.
It is said that his temperament changed greatly after he arrived at primary school and he fell in love with fishing. He worked in that primary school until he retired.
Third, the compromise was neglected, and the banquet turned over.
A colleague who graduated with me to teach, although young, is extremely cowardly and timid, and belongs to the fringe in school.
The headmaster was overbearing and looked down on him. Several members of the team also gave him "little shoes" intentionally or unintentionally, and often did something "harmless and insulting" to him. He resigned himself to his fate and was helpless.
One day, a guest from the Education Bureau came from above, and the principal and team members gave a banquet in the school cafeteria.
Egged on by a teacher, he boldly went to the canteen and asked the principal why he was dragging his medical insurance card.
If the headmaster can't hang up in front of the guests, let him go. At this time, he didn't know where he got the "power of the wild". In a rage, he overturned the banquet table and spilled soup all over the leader.
Strange to say, after the "big fight" banquet, the principal looked at him seriously, and the medical insurance card was quickly completed for him.
But he also seems to be a different person. He changed the image of doormat in the past, and everything he said and did in school became a bit "domineering". He is no longer the old one.
There is a simple reason. Someone told the headmaster that the colleague had a history of some kind of genetic disease at home, so don't make him angry and make a mountain out of a molehill.
School is the most secular acquaintance society, and teachers generally don't tear their faces with principals.
In fact, it is rare to find "alternative" teachers who oppose the principal, and even less come out of the public mind. I have only met Mr. Ma.
If there are no special circumstances, it is estimated that no teacher likes to oppose the principal.
If so, it can only show that there is something wrong with the principal, the teacher, or both.
There are generally three kinds of teachers who like to oppose the principal:
The first type: high talent, high level of knowledge, strong working ability, aloof and lofty, may look down on the level of ordinary people, especially disapprove of some work arrangements of the principal, and like to question or object; The second type: strong sense of justice, calm temperament, honesty and frankness, outspoken, dare to expose and question unreasonable phenomena, outspoken when in doubt, dare to contradict leaders and dare to express opinions.
The third type: paranoid personality, extreme in doing things, strong in self-awareness and self-protection. Just like a hedgehog, others are afraid to get close to him, and when they get close to him, they will open their spines to protect themselves. Interpersonal tension, not to mention the principal, is also difficult to be with others. Because the principal is the manager of the school, it is easier to have friction with such teachers in class.
These three types of teachers are all around us.
The first kind of teachers, who are difficult to manage, often do excellent work, even if they don't like it, they don't like it, and there are always endless complaints. In fact, they also carry out the work assigned by the leaders to the letter, and even the work efficiency is still very high, but there is always dissatisfaction, because he always feels that other people's organizational arrangements are not optimal, nor are they the most scientific and reasonable.
The second kind of teacher, a straightforward person, is honest and outspoken, and can say whatever he wants. He is not good at hiding his feelings, and he can't hide them. When he sees something unreasonable, he can't shut up. This type of teacher not only likes to confront the headmaster, but also gets along with everyone. In fact, they have no meaning or ulterior motives. They are just straightforward people.
The third kind of teacher, in fact, is inferior in the final analysis. They are always in a state of self-defense, often complicate simple problems, and often hear hints about themselves from other people's words. They are often worried that others will look down on themselves, aim at themselves and deliberately bypass themselves, so they often have friction with others. In fact, there is no malice in their hearts, and they don't like to go against the headmaster, let alone deliberately.
I am the one who likes to be against the headmaster.
Some time ago, I discussed several issues with the headmaster. One is to go to work too early, and the other is to get off work too late.
In 20 14, a new headmaster came to our school, and he postponed his work time to 7:25. Basically, all the teachers like his practice very much. This is a principal who really cares about the health of teachers, because their school was so humanized before she was transferred from a key middle school to be the principal. The so-called first-class principals stress academics, while third-rate principals stress attendance. Most principals want their teachers to continue working. Occasionally find yourself not working, and you feel lazy. In fact, the most difficult thing for the whole school is that the principal doesn't have to attend classes, and he also receives a post salary of 2000 yuan. The most hateful thing is that 99.9% of principals take hard-working teachers as their responsibility. By the next principal and this principal, they changed the teacher's sign-in time to 7: 10, and the teacher who attended the class in the morning will be present at 6:40. As for me, I basically arrive at 6:40 every time and have to go down at 6:50.
When I first came to our school, I finished school at 16:40 in the afternoon. Later, I don't know which abnormal principal changed the time to 17:20, which was a whole class late. Before, after school, there was still a class time to play football with students. Now that teachers are going crazy at work, how can they have time to communicate with students?
Over the years, we have been struggling with principals and administrators. Annual assessment, civilized classes, and various appraisals all depend on relationships. When a group of administrative leaders rely on relationships in everything, a group of teachers who oppose them will be trained and emerge. It is very foolish for a leader to do so. They don't understand, they are not the boss, and they don't pay our wages. No matter what they do is unfair, they will never become emperors. What they have to do is to give full play to the light and heat of every teacher with all their abilities, instead of trying to accumulate and create more unfairness.
I have met such a teacher who dared to oppose the principal. I admire such a teacher. Such people are open-minded, brave and outspoken, and belong to the selfless world inside. Teachers who dare to stand up to the headmaster are all good!
The female teacher who dares to confront the director is admirable!
Teachers who dare to confront the headmaster have a sense of justice, which also shows that the headmaster has done many unfair things. There are fewer and fewer such people now.
What do you think of this?
Nobody likes to quarrel with the boss unless it is absolutely necessary.
Now it is the principal responsibility system, and the principal has absolute power in personnel and finance. Who can throw an egg at a stone unless it is absolutely necessary?
The teacher who quarrels with the headmaster is nothing more than the following situations:
1, high level, strong self-esteem, not interested in the principal's work arrangement, arguing with the principal for work.
2, some middle-level leaders, the principal always suppressed them and quarreled with the principal in order to fight for power.
3. In terms of professional title evaluation, priority evaluation and class arrangement. The headmaster is unfair, or the teacher thinks it is unfair, and quarrels with the headmaster for the benefit.
4. It is basically unreasonable for some teachers with background and some lazy hooligans to quarrel with the principal because of his strict management or deduction of grades.
Some teachers have a sense of justice. They don't like the arrogance or lawlessness of some principals. They were angry and argued with the headmaster.
No matter what type, teachers generally go to the headmaster rationally, and the headmaster is generally unreasonable and arrogant, so that the two sides are at loggerheads and bickering endlessly.
In this case, the teacher should not be put against the principal, but the principal should think carefully. Where is he wrong? Why do weak people like teachers dare to quarrel with strong people like principals? It is actually a good thing to have such a teacher. They can make the headmaster make fewer mistakes.
So the headmaster must ask himself first when he encounters such a situation. See if you did anything wrong. If we really want to do it, we should change it. If we don't want to do it, we should encourage it. Only in this way can the headmaster's work be carried out smoothly.
Such teachers are basically honest and frank, lofty and talented.
I still remember my high school history stone teacher. Teacher Shi himself graduated from the Department of Mathematics of Tsinghua University, but he has taught history for half his life.
According to his own description, at that time, because his family was a rich farmer, it affected distribution. Supposedly, with Mr. Shi's education, he can't go to our high school, at least not to a key middle school.
Teacher Shi always complains about his ill-fated fate. Although he has achieved something, he has learned nothing. He repeatedly failed to find the principal's theory, and even repeatedly found the dean to adjust classes. He even found the Education Bureau to reflect many times. The conclusion is that there are plenty of math teachers, and this arrangement is flattering him and entrusting him with important tasks.
Teacher Shi feels that he is a talented person, that he is a swift horse, and that he cannot meet a good Bole. We didn't understand this at that time. To tell the truth, Mr. Shi is knowledgeable. Although mathematics is his major, history is the first in the county.
Although Mr. Shi always quarrels with the headmaster, he says he can't mislead others. Perhaps the headmaster is helpless, and Teacher Shi is talented and the backbone of education. The headmaster sometimes eats coptis silently.
The students in our class witnessed the headmaster being speechless by Teacher Shi, and glared at him with anxiety. After the quarrel, we still respect each other.
Personally, I think there may be the following situations. First, the principal is unfair, which leads to the teacher's dissatisfaction. Let some teachers who dare to speak out and question face to face with the principal.
If teachers feel unfair in professional title evaluation, performance distribution, teaching work distribution, etc. There will be teachers challenging the headmaster.
Second, teachers may have extreme ideas. Disapproving of the principal's behavior and school management measures may have certain authority in teaching. So dare to fight against the principal,
Third, some old oil slickers in the school are muddling along at school, holding money with senior titles, but their work is particularly leisurely, and they are dissatisfied with the newly assigned work of the principal. Because of my age, I feel that I am a senior, so I dare to go against the principal.
Finally, in fact, in school, I personally feel that no teacher likes to oppose the principal. After all, teachers are managed. It is not good for teachers to have too much conflict with the principal. Unless the teacher and the principal have a deep hatred, they may deliberately oppose the principal everywhere.
In a word, the headmaster, as the manager of the school, should not only manage the school work in an orderly way, but also handle the relationship between the headmaster and the teacher, so that the teacher can better obey the management and make his due contribution to the education work. A good principal should be supported, loved and respected by teachers. The relationship with teachers should be to help each other and learn from each other at work. Usually, you should be able to care about the teacher, be approachable and get along with the teacher. Nobody likes to go against the headmaster.
When I first started working, the headmaster always discussed the solution with the teachers, and the teachers were willing to ask the headmaster for help when they had difficulties. At that time, there was no difference between the principal and the teacher. The headmaster and the teacher have classes, eat together, sleep in the same dormitory, and play ball games and joke together when they are free. That relationship was really harmonious.
Later, things gradually changed. First of all, the headmaster has a special office and lounge. The principal no longer attends classes, and the affairs of the school are no longer negotiated with the teachers. At most, he talked to the school Committee, and the teachers no longer asked the principal for help to solve personal affairs. Gradually, the principal is really the principal, and the teacher is really a teacher. The gap is widening. The headmaster no longer trusts the teacher, and the teacher no longer trusts the headmaster. Opposing feelings gradually formed.
However, although the headmaster and the teacher are in opposition, few teachers openly oppose the headmaster. At best, I complain behind my back. In this way, they are also afraid of accidentally spreading it to the principal, which will lead to more than one can bear. Especially since the last elimination, two-way selection, and the employment of the county management school ..., the principal has a problem. Who dares to oppose the headmaster, can only be silent!
As for the teacher's psychology of opposing the principal, I think everyone knows. First, if the general teacher is against the headmaster, he must have plans to leave school, and he is sure; Second, the middle-level leaders and the principal are working against each other, and they certainly have not satisfied themselves in some aspects; Third, someone suddenly turned against the principal, and he may have something on the principal. ...
In a word, no teacher in the school will go against the headmaster. If there is, it must be the principal's fault!
I'm the vice principal! I especially like talented young teachers with thorns in their heads.
They are thoughtful, energetic, energetic and can bring a lot of inspiration to my work. Make good use of them, and the school will be full of vitality. Actually, they'd better communicate. As long as you are willing to be with them, play together, even eat together and live together, everything will be easy.
Encourage them to reform and innovate, encourage and reward their achievements in time, let them see hope, be their strong backing, charge ahead, relieve their worries, and let them move forward easily in work, life and study.
When they grew up, I became the shopkeeper of cutting. Very good!
For the old, the work is not good, often picky, smiling, not offending, ignoring. Bonuses are based on teaching achievements. Once the rules are made, they have nothing to say. The key point is to treat everyone as fairly as possible, especially young teachers, and encourage and train more. As for whether they can be grateful to you after they become talents, it doesn't matter. I believe that in a word, in the job, especially in the leadership position, for the teacher himself, there can be no distinction between likes and dislikes, only the difference between working ability and low. Assign work according to ability and reward according to quality. There is basically nothing to say!
The headmaster is the lubricant of a school. As long as there is a general direction for arranging work, it will act as the lubricant between departments and teachers, and the school machines will operate normally, even at high speed!